This is the arresting title of a 2005 paper by a Harvard medic John Ioannidis. It is especially arresting for a research scientist like me. And he really does mean it, although I should say that he is talking mainly about medical research, not physics.
Read more
I am not a baseball fan. I have been to only one baseball game. This was an LA Dodgers game when I was working in LA. The Dodgers lost, and the highlight for me was the hotdog. But baseball is known to be very nerd friendly as it generates lots of stats: batting averages, pitching […]
Read more
The picture is of Emmy Noether, a theoretical physicist/mathematician from the first half of the twentieth century. Despite coming up with one of the deepest theorems in physics, she is not well known, in particular, her contemporary Marie Curie is much better known. A large majority of the physicists who have revolutionised our understanding of the natural […]
Read more
Over Christmas I try to do a bit of reading, of papers I may not have time to think about during term time. I am reading a couple (1,2) of papers by McKnight and coworkers in the biology journal Cell. In a nutshell, they have discovered, at least partially by accident it appears, that important […]
Read more
Term has now ended, undergraduate teaching has finished for 2012, and most of the undergraduates have gone home. As always at the end of term, there is a certain amount of relief, it has been 11 weeks of hard work. But also a bit of sadness. Campus is a quieter, duller place without most of […]
Read more
I have almost finished the biography of a scientific hero of mine, Pierre-Gilles de Gennes. One observation in the book has particularly struck me, and that is that de Gennes viewed his approach as more like that of the Impressionist artists, and less like the approach of the artist Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres.
Read more
Comment