In an earlier post, I pointed out that, according to one metric used to assess how good a scientist is, I am twice as good as a hamster. One way of assessing not a scientist, but a single scientific paper, is how many other scientific papers reference (cite) it. This is certainly a measure of […]
Read more
As a final year high school student I went to open days at Dutch Universities, trying to find out what I wanted to do later. Later? I did not really know what that meant. So I passively absorbed the information given to me by enthusiastic staff and students in colourful T-shirts. I had an interest […]
Read more
This was (according to the mighty Wikipedia) the title of a talk given by Edward Lorenz, one of the pioneers of chaos theory. Apparently, Lorenz didn’t come up with the title himself. He was too lazy/badly organised to give the organisers a title for his talk, so one of the organisers, in frustration, came up with this title. I can sympathise with the organisers here. I am currently organising a workshop, and am at the stage when my co-chair and I are trying to extract the last few titles from our speakers. It can be tricky to get some people to come up with a simple 10 to 20 word title.
Read more
I am not a baseball fan. I have been to only one baseball game. This was an LA Dodgers game when I was working in LA. The Dodgers lost, and the highlight for me was the hotdog. But baseball is known to be very nerd friendly as it generates lots of stats: batting averages, pitching […]
Read more
The picture is of Emmy Noether, a theoretical physicist/mathematician from the first half of the twentieth century. Despite coming up with one of the deepest theorems in physics, she is not well known, in particular, her contemporary Marie Curie is much better known. A large majority of the physicists who have revolutionised our understanding of the natural […]
Read more
Comment